Firms tend to default to one staffing model out of habit rather than genuine fit: always permanent, because that's how it's always been done, or always temporary, to avoid a longer-term commitment. Both defaults get it wrong roughly as often as they get it right. The better question isn't which model is generally best; it's which one actually matches the shape of the need in front of you.
When temporary genuinely makes sense
Temporary support can work well for holiday or sickness cover, busy periods, parental or personal leave, or to bridge the gap while recruiting for a permanent role. There is usually a clear start date, although the end date can often be more flexible depending on the circumstances. The key is having someone who can step in quickly, adapt to the team and provide reliable support for as long as they are needed.
When a fixed term contract makes sense
Fixed term contracts are most commonly used to cover maternity or parental leave, or where additional support is needed for a defined period of time. Unlike temporary work, there is usually a confirmed start and end date, giving both the firm and the candidate greater certainty. They can be a great option for candidates looking for longer term stability without committing to a permanent move, while giving firms consistent support for the full period required.
Temp-to-perm: a trial without the full risk
Where a firm wants to test genuine fit, both skill and culture, before committing to a permanent hire, temp-to-perm arrangements are common in this market for exactly that reason. It's a lower-risk way to confirm a decision that a single interview process often can't fully settle, particularly for roles with a lot of client or partner-facing responsibility.
Where permanent is the better call
Permanent recruitment is usually the better option when consistency and long term relationships really matter. It provides stability and gives someone the opportunity to become an integral part of the day to day running of the practice. Temporary support can be invaluable in the right circumstances, but when the need is ongoing and you have the time to wait for the right fit, a permanent hire will usually be the better long term choice.
A simple way to decide
Ask whether the need in front of you is a role or a moment. If the work will still exist in the same shape twelve months from now, that's a permanent hire, even if it doesn't feel urgent enough yet to commit to one. If the certainty only really extends three, six or nine months out, temporary staffing is doing exactly the job it's meant to.
About Assiduous Staffing
Assiduous Staffing is a Sydney-based legal support recruitment agency, founded by Claire Booth, placing exceptional legal support and business operations professionals into law firms and in-house legal teams across Australia. From Legal Secretaries and Executive Assistants through to Practice Managers and Legal Operations specialists, we recruit exclusively within legal support, which means genuine depth in a market most agencies only cover in passing.